Friday, June 17, 2016

My first DNA Match!

'I have received my results of my DNA and find that you are one of the people (the other is my nephew) who is a match with me.  I also have family named Eastland who lived in Kent.'

This is an extract from an email which arrived out of the blue from a lady, previously unknown to me, named Su. So who was Su and how did she connect with me?

A long time ago I posted that I had taken a genetic genealogy test with Family Tree DNA (FTDNA). Events intervened and I was not able to progress the results for some time, so you can imagine my delight when I received this email. A quick look at my database - it's such a long time since I progressed that particular branch - and I found my EASTLANDs of Kent right out at the end of my maternal grandmother's line. Terminal twigs on the family tree!

There are three main genetic genealogy tests:

  • Y-DNA, which traces back genetic changes passed down the male line and so goes back hundreds and thousands of years.
  • Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), which traces back genetic changes passed down the female line and so also goes back hundreds and thousands of years.
  • Autosomal DNA (atDNA) which shows how my DNA has been made up of a mixture of the DNA from my parents, their parents, their parents, and so on.  As the DNA gets randomly diluted from generation to generation, atDNA is only useful to about 7 generations, say 200 years, back.

The test where Su and I matched was for autosomal DNA (FTDNA call it Family Finder) and my FTDNA results web page suggested that we were in the range 2nd - 4th Cousin. When it came to it they weren't far out!

No EASTLAND names matched initially but a day later and a few emails back and forth and we quickly established the connection. Su kindly sent a Family Group Sheet with both my ancestor Sarah EASTLAND and Sarah's brother Virgil EASTLAND and their parents. Another generation back - thanks, Su! - and the paper trail and the genetic genealogy results were both overlapping nicely showing that Su and I are fifth cousins.

Well, a lot more work would be needed on my part to bring the connection up to the full Genealogical Proof Standard - will I even manage it in my lifetime? The family history job list is quite long already and getting longer by the day. Every family historian will identify with that one and the need to prioritise! Never mind, the evidence looks pretty secure and, for the time being, I am content with that.

So, thanks to Su and my genetic genealogy DNA test I have found a new fifth cousin, extended a branch of my family tree by two generations, and proved to myself the effectiveness of this new tool in the family historian’s toolbox. Oh, and I've increased my score!

Thanks again, Su!



'The greatest history book ever written is the one hidden in our DNA.'
Dr. Spencer Wells


Tuesday, February 23, 2016

A Random Act of Kindness

It was old and battered and forlorn and its spine was falling apart. A bit like the writer, really. But there the resemblance ends, because this was—a Family Bible published in 1776.

None of us knew that we had a Family Bible, let alone one over two hundred years old that included some family names with their dates of birth written into the initial pages. When my eldest sister found it while rummaging through some old boxes she was as excited as I was. Her immediate kind reaction was to tell me, as the family historian, and to send me scans of the inscriptions inside the Bible, with the book itself following in the post.

The Inscriptions

So what was written on those fly pages?

Well, the most impressive inscription was a manuscript dedication in the most beautiful calligraphy. It immediately reminded me of another example of similarly beautiful hand-writing in the family, although that was of a rather later date and from another branch—the BISHOPPs.

The dedication reads:
Richard Osmond
The Gift of his Uncle
GEORGE GODDARD



And who was Richard OSMOND? Well, if his uncle was George GODDARD, then presumably his mother was also a GODDARD. As it happens I have a Richard OSMOND, 1804 - 1878, whose parents were John OSMOND and Mary (also referred to as Molly) GODDARD. Bingo! That makes him my great great grandfather and George is (to me) a new member of the family.




The next two pages have a list of the children of Richard OSMOND and Ann For some reason the left-hand page has a copy of the names on the right, with a couple of additions. No, I don't know why, either.


Left-hand page Right-hand page
Richard Osmond Born Decr 29th 1804
Ann Osmond Born July 3rd 1803
Richard Osmond born Decr 29th...
Ann Osmond Born July 3 18...
Children of the Above Children of the Above when Born
Edmund Osmond Born Novr 16th 1827
Alfred Osmond Do. Feby 26 1829
Do Do Died May 15 1831
Sarah Osmond Born Novr 26 1830
Mary Osmond Do Novr 2 1832
Do Do Died Novr 23 1837
Emma Osmond born March 7 1836
Elizabeth Osmond Born Novr 25 1837

Edmund Osmond Born Novr 16th 1827
Alfred Osmond Do. Feby 26 1829
Do Do Died May 15 1831
Sarah Osmond Born Novr 26th 1830
Mary Osmond Do Novr 2 - 1832
Do Died 
Novr 23 - 1837
Emma Osmond Do March 7 - 188...
Elizabeth Osmond Born Novr 25 - 18...
Maria Osmond Do Jan 7 - 18...
William Osmond Do Sept 2 - 18...
Do Do Died 
Novr 26 18...

Let's have a look at those two parents.

Richard OSMOND

Richard OSMOND's date of birth is given in the Family Bible as December 29th, 1804. This ties in nicely with the date I already have from the record in the Hurstbourne Tarrant parish registers (now kept at the Hampshire County Record Office) which records his baptism on 30 January 1805 and where he is described as 'Richard Osmond sn of John and Mary bn 29 Dec last'.

He was described as a butcher:
  • At the time of his sons Edmund and Alfred's baptisms in 1827 and 1829 respectively in the St Mary Reading parish records,
  • In the 1851 census when he was living at 58 Hurstbourne Street, Hurstbourne Tarrant along with Ann and his children Edmund, Ann and Maria,
  • At his son Edmund's wedding in 1854,
  • In the 1861 census also at Hurstbourne Street with Ann, his children Ann and Elizabeth, and his grandson John Hooper OSMOND, and
  • In the 1871 census, by now at Sheepward Street, Hurstbourne Tarrant.

Was this his marriage?

So when did he marry, and what was Ann's maiden name? The only record I could find of a Richard OSMOND marrying an Ann in the period 1822 - 1832 was on 21 August 1827 at St George's, Hanover Square where he was named as 'Richard Osmond, a bachelor of this parish' and she was named as 'Ann Pullin, a spinster of the parish of Caversham in the County of Oxford'. Could this be the right couple? If so, then they were a long way from home, though that might have been explained by the four months between their marriage and the birth of their first child.

Bishop's Transcript of Marriage of Richard Osmond and Ann Pullin,
21 Aug 1827, St George Hanover Square, Westminster

Then I found a record on the FamilySearch web site of the death their daughter Sarah [Osmond] ROMBALD [sic] on 22 March 1932 in Chatsworth, Livingston, Illinois, USA. Bingo! again. Imagine my surprise and delight when I saw that her parents were named there as 'Richard Osmond' and 'Ann Pullen' [sic]. So the St George's, Hanover Square marriage indeed appears to be the likely one. This just goes to show the importance of researching collateral lines as well as the main line.

I will be posting more details of Sarah and her marriage and emigration to the United States here soon.

In Remembrance

He and Ann, as well as three of their children, are remembered on a headstone in Hurstbourne Tarrant which reads:
In Loving Memory of
Ann Osmond wife of Richard
born 1806 died 1869
and Alfred died 1831 aged 2 years and 3 months May 20th 1831
Mary died 1837 aged 3 years Nov 28th 1837
and William died 1841
On the kerbing at the bottom:
Richard Osmond died March 22nd 1878 aged 73 yrs
The dates of death for Alfred and Mary differ slightly from those in the Bible; perhaps those on the grave refer to their burials.

Reading Mercury - Saturday 30 March 1878

Ann

As for Ann, her date of birth is given as July 3, 1805. Again, this ties in nicely with the approximate date that I already had from the 1851 census of about 1804 at Kintbury in Berkshire.  The Family Bible now gives us an exact date.

Reading Mercury - Saturday 23 January 1869

The Children

They all have their own stories; I will tell what I know of their stories in a later post here.


So thank you, sister, for this contribution of yours to the family records!


No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
AESOP, The Lion and the Mouse


Monday, January 18, 2016

An OSMOND Loses Out...

...but was he one of ours?


From the Police Gazette for Monday 6 July 1863



The furthest we have traced our OSMOND line back is to Stephen OSMOND, 1657 - 1713, of Ogbourne St George in Wiltshire. From the beginning to the middle of the nineteenth century the family were in the area of Hurstbourne Tarrant in Hampshire, some fifty miles or so north east of Okeford Fitzpaine, so no close geographical connection to William OSMOND. I have six William OSMONDs in my records but none looks a likely match to this William OSMOND.

A project based at University College London (UCL) that is investigating the distribution of surnames in Great Britain, both current and historic and displays its results at the publicprofiler web site. The Distribution of OSMOND surname in 1881 page shows the OSMOND name appearing in 1881 across the south western counties of England, as well as some in South Wales and, of course, London. The South Wales connection is probably through coal mining - there were coal mines in northern Somerset until recent times and mining families from there would move to the more prosperous South Wales coal field in search of better wages.

By Keith Pickering (Own work)
[CC BY-SA 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

As you might expect, the OSMONDs had spread out across the country in the more than one hundred years between 1881 and 1998. However, the Distribution of OSMOND surname in 1998 page shows that they are still mainly in the South of England although there is an isolated bunch in the Galashiels area, just north of the border between England and Scotland. What was that all about? There must be an interesting story behind their appearance as a little island so far from the south of England.

And, of course, there is said to be a family of rather well-known singers in the United States with the surname OSMOND, though I understand that their roots are in Oxfordshire...

So I have found no direct connection between our family and William OSMOND - a pity, as that watch, if it had ever been found, would have made an heirloom with an interesting story behind it.